The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs .300 Winchester Magnum ammo rounds. First, the .270 Winchester is significantly longer. So, while the rifle chambered in 300 WSM is not significantly lighter, it’s a tiny bit shorter and handier. After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. Finally, it’s also nice to have that extra round or two of ammunition in your magazine available if you end up needing it one day. This makes sense since the 270 WSM is specifically designed to fit in a short action rifle instead of a standard length action like the .270 Winchester. Is it significantly more accurate than the .338 Winchester Magnum? While the performance of the two cartridges at reasonable hunting ranges is very similar, the logistics of getting a good rifle, quality ammunition, or even reloading components for the .388 Win Mag are so much simpler for that cartridge when compared to the 325 WSM. Is it significantly more accurate than the .300 Winchester Magnum? The same goes for game like mountain goat, bighorn sheep, Himalayan Tahr, and chamois. At the same time, the 300 WSM has most closely lived up to the hype, which explains why it’s far and away the most popular of the bunch. The .300 Winchester Magnum is extremely popular and is consistently among the Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year. This is illustrated in the table below comparing Federal Premium and Hornady factory ammunition loaded with 140gr Trophy Bonded Tip (.430 BC) and 162gr ELD-X (.631 BC) bullets in 7mm WSM and 7mm Rem Mag. None of them have covered any new ground. AFAICT, they fill the same niche and produce the same down-range results with the 140 grain bullets that I'm shooting from both of them. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufact Once again, there’s a good selection for both, but rifles chambered in 270 WSM aren’t quite as common and are usually more expensive. Now, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges were not the first commercially produced short magnums. Probably not. Plus, the .270 WSM could poach from an already extensive lineup of .277 bullets designed for the .270 Win. My favorite among all the new magnums is the .270 WSM. 6.5 Creedmoor vs 243 Winchester Review & Comparison, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 7mm-08 Remington Review & Comparison, 6.5 Grendel vs 308: Everything You Need To Know, Essential Muzzleloader Supplies Every Hunter Needs In 2020, The 300 Ultra Mag (300 RUM): Your Complete Guide, 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel: What You Need To Know, 6.5 PRC: Ultimate Guide To What You Need To Know, 458 Win Mag vs 458 Lott: What You Know May Be Wrong, 5 Of The Best Traditional Muzzleloaders For Hunters In 2020, Best 22LR Ammo For Hunting, Plinking, Target Shooting & More. Like all the other Winchester Short Magnum cartridges, the 325 WSM is specifically designed to fit in a short action rifle instead of a standard length action like the larger .338 Winchester Magnum. And, if you're a 7mm fan, don't overlook the deadly 7mm-08 Remington. Additionally, while neither cartridge has a belt, the .270 Winchester uses a traditional rimless design while the 270 WSM has a rebated rim. The 7mm-08 case is just slightly longer than the parent .308â2.035 inches vs. 2.015 inchesâbut maintains the same 20-degree shoulder of the .308 Winchester. The 7mm Winchester Short Magnum very likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter and fatter powder column. The answers to the above questions really depend on the rifle, ammunition, and shooter in question though. Well, the 200gr 325 WSM bullet starts off with a little bit less muzzle energy than the 200 grain .338 Win Mag bullet, but the 325 WSM is more aerodynamic and pulls ahead in the energy and trajectory departments at 100 yards and 300 yards respectively. The .300 Win Mag is a bit more widely adopted, but you probably won’t have any issues finding a nice rifle chambered in 300 WSM either. However, even though the 7mm Mag is derived from the .375 H&H Magnum and itself uses a fatter case than cartridges like the .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield, the 7mm WSM still has a significantly fatter case with less taper and a steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 25 degrees).Even though the 7mm WSM uses a larger diameter case, the 7mm Rem Mag uses a relatively large diameter case itself and is significantly longer. It also spawned an entire family of cartridges. The .270 WSM, as I mentioned, does generate better ballistics than the old .270. The Big Game Hunting Blog is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca, Amazon.com.au, and other Amazon stores worldwide. The recoil of some hard hitting cartridges. Inside of 200 yards no advantage. With this in mind, designers at Winchester Repeating Arms elected to build a line of cartridges that could fit in a short length action with the goal of achieving similar performance to popular standard length cartridges. That heavier and more aerodynamic bullet retains energy better at long range and the edge in kinetic energy grows as the distance increases. For those reasons, the .300 Win Mag actually has significantly more case capacity (around 10-15% more, depending on the manufacturer) than the 300 WSM. 150 grain, 165 grain, 180 grain, 190 grain, 200 grain, and 220 grain bullets are the most popular.Similar to the case with the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, the 300 WSM and .300 Win Mag factory loads often fire the exact same bullet at virtually identical velocities. In fact, those two cartridges are likely among the Top 10 best â¦ This specific model weighs 7.25 pounds when chambered in both 300 WSM and .300 Winchester Magnum. As fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out, the 325 Winchester Short Magnum likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column. Sep 12, 2010 #6 2010 Ontario F Class Champion used a 270WSM necked up to 7mm. The 270 WSM is one of the few calibers that actually has a ballistic advantage over the standard caliber of its own. Subscriber Services. Rifles in both cartridges are also extremely common. Absolutely. While all four are pretty commonly available, the .270 Winchester and the 7mm Remington Magnum are by far the most popular out of the bunch. But just like with trajectory though, they are close enough that you can say they have essentially the same amount of wind drift. However, while that may well contribute somewhat to improved accuracy, there are many other factors that influence accuracy to a much larger degree. This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. It also carries a tad more energy out to longer range and is capable of excellent accuracy. What about accuracy of the 325 WSM vs 338 Win Mag? with advertised prices as low as a dollar a round for quality ammunition. They’re both solid performing cartridges, but I’d personally choose the 7mm Remington Magnum over the 7mm Winchester Short Magnum. However, they’re being measured against four of the most popular American centerfire rifle cartridges of all time in the .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, .300 Winchester Magnum, and .338 Winchester Magnum, and that’s a tough hurdle to get over. You can even use them both on larger game like kudu, eland, red stag, elk, and moose with great results. Thanks for your support. However, the 270 WSM has a very fat case with minimal taper and a much steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 17.5 degrees).For those reasons, the 270 WSM is unique among the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges for actually having significantly more case capacity (around 10-20% more, depending on the case manufacturer) than its standard length cousin. These are interesting cases where both lines of ammo use the same style bullet for both cartridges, but the Nosler ammunition uses a heavier bullet for the .338 Win Mag and Winchester uses a heavier bullet for the 325 WSM. RifleShooter Magazine editor Scott Rupp breaks down all the features of the Mossberg Patriot Predator rifle chambered in 6.5 PRC. As a quick aside, the choice of a .323″ (8mm) bullet diameter for the 325 WSM was a pretty big surprise to the shooting industry, which was expecting Winchester to release a 338 WSM instead. However, other cartridges, like the 6.5 Creedmoor and .308 Winchester (which have overall lengths of 2.825″ and 2.81″ respectively), are about a half inch shorter and will therefore fit into what’s commonly known as a “short-action” rifle. The Winchester Short Mags all undoubtedly offer at least some advantages to the shooter that, if nothing else, can potentially help improve his or her confidence and maximize his or her shooting abilities. The same goes for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland with great results and I personally lean towards these bigger .30 caliber cartridges as opposed to the .270 and 7mm cartridges previously discussed for an Africa, Canada, or New Zealand hunting safari. Indeed, the 6.5 Remington Magnum, the .350 Remington Magnum, and the line of proprietary Lazzeroni cartridges all came on the scene before the WSM line, but none really caught fire for various reasons. Felt recoil will vary from shooter to shooter and rifle to rifle, but free recoil energy is still a useful way to compare cartridges. In that same vein, those fat, stubby 270 WSM cartridges with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes present feeding problems. However, standard/long actions and short actions are two of the most common and are most relevant to the development of the Winchester Short Magnum line of cartridges. To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine. However, the 325 Winchester Short Magnum doesn’t have a closely related standard length cousin that’s widely used in North America. I'm struggling with the same issue. After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. Plus, the .270 WSM could poach from an already extensive lineup of .277 â¦ Specifically, the new 270 WSM, 7mm WSM, 300 WSM, and 325 WSM cartridges were all designed to use a very compact case that would fit in a short action rifle. The 7mm WSM and 7mm Remington Magnum are best suited for the exact same hunting situations. Cases extracted from my 7mm RM have a tiny scratch on them, making it easy to count how many times they've been chambered. However, the rifles are noticeably lightweight, offering non belted magnum performance; that all shoot accurately. Both cartridges will work really well on whitetail and mule deer sized game out to several hundred yards. The .222 Rem. So, while the 7mm WSM is faster on paper, the two cartridges have essentially the same velocity for all intents and purposes. The exact size of the rifle action (which includes the locking bolt, firing pin, etc.) 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester Of course, this is not always the case and some rifles chambered in 7mm WSM rifles feed quite reliably, but it’s more of an issue with that cartridge that’s not as often encountered with the 7mm Rem Mag and its longer, slimmer, and more tapered case. With these loads, the bullet from the 7mm WSM is going 50-60 feet per second faster than the bullet from the 7mm Rem Mag. The difference is not, however, extraordinarily dramatic. The 270 Winchester Short Magnum very likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column. However, even though the .338 Win Mag (like the 7mm Rem Mag and .300 Win Mag) is derived from the .375 H&H Magnum and uses a fatter case than cartridges like the .270 Winchester, the 325 WSM still has a much fatter case with less taper and a steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 25 degrees). At 500 yards the .270 Win. In that same vein, those fat, stubby 7mm WSM cartridges with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes present feeding problems. That extra velocity makes a bit of a difference in terms of wind drift and overall trajectory to be sure, but that slightly flatter trajectory is less important in this day and age of laser rangefinders, particularly if you have a scope equipped with a bullet drop compensating dial. If you prefer a shorter, potentially lighter rifle, that’s slightly faster cycling and easier to carry, but still has magnum performance, then go with the 300 WSM. Like I said, they’re all well designed and very capable hunting cartridges. Virtually every major brand of ammo is available in 7mm Rem Mag. The last of these cartridges, the .325 WSM, was introduced in 2005. At the same time, the lighter recoil and flatter trajectory of the 325 WSM give it a bit of a leg up on .338 Win Mag for hunting deer sized game where the extra power of the .338 Win Mag isn’t as useful. Far Zero for the WSM load and the 140 grain 7mm load is identical, while FZ of the heavy WSM load is 10 yards longer than the 160 grain 7mm. RifleShooter Digital Staff - April 20, 2020. CVA Paramount Muzzleloader: Read This Before You Buy One! Rifles and ammo are widely available for both guns, but with an almost 80-year head start you’ll encounter more .270 Win. This is one of the tougher aspects of using the 325 WSM: there’s not a gigantic variety of factory ammo or a large number of bullet choices for hand loaders to choose from. However, the .270 Win.’s long case body feeds easily in most rifles while the WSM has a reputation for being more finicky. When you consider the fact that the 270 WSM has significantly more case capacity than the older .270 Winchester and that both cartridges have the same maximum SAAMI pressure, it shouldn’t be surprising that the 270 WSM is actually capable of shooting the same weight bullet at a higher velocity than the .270 Winchester. Absolutely. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the .300 Win Mag and 300 WSM are widely available. While both cartridges are really too light for hunting extremely large, thick skinned dangerous game like cape buffalo, they will both fit the bill for hunting Grizzly or Alaska Brown Bear. However, the same rifle in .338 Win Mag is advertised at 7.75 pounds and 46.75″ long overall (because it has a 26″ barrel instead of a 24″ barrel like the 325 WSM rifle). But at the opposite-and-equal-reaction end of that recoil is the bullet carrying 3,850 ft-lbs kinetic energy. In fact, depending on the exact brand of factory ammo we’re talking about (like Barnes VOR-TX), the 300 WSM may have a faster published velocity. Perhaps the most surprising comparative result was that the 150 grain.270 WSM load carries more energy downrange than either of the 7mm Rem Mag loads. Is the 270 WSM capable of excellent accuracy? Remember: we’re talking about accuracy under practical hunting conditions, not benchrest shooting where a .1″ or .2″ improvement in group size can make a big difference. Having said all that, when I recently compared the two, I ended up with the 7mmRM. The fact of the matter is that regardless of the rifle cartridge in question, the shooter is almost always the weakest link in the accuracy equation. In 1925 Winchester necked down the .30-03 to .277 and created the .270 Win., a sporting cartridge designed for medium-size game that shot flatter yet recoiled less than the .30-06 Springfield. But off the top of my head it would seem to be the case. Is it significantly more accurate than the 7mm Remington Magnum? Just like with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester, 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag is significantly longer than the 325 WSM. 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag With this load, the .270 WSM generates roughly 250 additional foot-pounds of energy over its competitor at the muzzle when both cartridges are fired from 24-inch barrels. After all, a longer cartridge simply requires more space to feed and eject than a shorter cartridge. Is it significantly more accurate than the .270 Winchester? The particular 300 WSM load above shoots the same weight bullet at very nearly the same muzzle velocity (over 99% as fast), but uses about 8.5% less powder. Basically, the .270 Winchester and .270 Winchester Short Magnum are best suited for the same hunting situations. For all intents and purposes, we can say that the two cartridges have the same ballistics. Even so, I’d personally lean towards .338 Win Mag since it generally functions more reliably, shoots larger diameter bullets, and is usually a tiny bit more powerful. Not surprisingly, this results in some interesting ballistic comparisons. The situation with rifles in is pretty similar. However, the 300 WSM could have an advantage on those sort of hunts because it’s available a smaller and easier to carry rifle. Are you just itching to take a rifle chambered in one of these cartridges on a hunt? After all, the .300 Win Mag is capable of excellent accuracy itself and is generally very highly regarded in that area as well. With that in mind, the 325 WSM is a better choice for situations where very large and tough game like sambar deer or moose are likely to be encountered at close range. Mag. Is the 300 WSM capable of excellent accuracy? They’re both great cartridges, but I’d probably lean towards the .270 Winchester. | I guess riflemen are becoming I am a fan of the WSM cartridges. October 28, 2013 Due to the long running popularity of 7mm cartridges like those just mentioned, there’s a great selection of quality bullets to choose from for both cartridges. I’m not sure if it cracks the Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year, but it’s likely in the Top 15 or Top 20. While I would not describe the 7mm WSM as a rare or hard to find cartridge, it’s not especially popular or widely available. Book an incredible Africa hunting safari here. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the 7mm Remington Magnum and 7mm Winchester Short Magnum are widely available. While virtually every big ammo manufacturer produces factory hunting ammo for the .338 Win Mag, only Nosler and Winchester Ammunition currently produce 325 WSM hunting ammo as part of their Trophy Grade, Expedition Big Game, Power Max Bonded, and Super X lines (loaded with the AccuBond, E-Tip, AccuBond CT, Bonded Rapid Expansion Hollow Point, and Power-Point bullet respectively), For those reasons, most sporting goods stores usually carry ammunition for the .338 Win Mag, but 325 WSM ammo can be significantly harder to find. Not surprisingly, many sportsmen and women were a little skeptical about the line of Winchester Short Magnum cartridges introduced in the early 2000s that claimed to offer even better performance than these legendary centerfire rifle hunting cartridges. )Author Ron Spomer has shot most cartridges from 22 CB cap to 505 Gibbs and taken game with most of them. Does the difference between the two cartridges in terms of accuracy make a difference for most hunters under typical conditions? To put this into perspective, a Boeing 737 commercial airliner travels at â¦ As you can see, the two Federal Premium loads used the exact same 180 grain bullets fired at the same velocity. Lightweight handy rifles giving magnum performance should have become more popular. The new .270 WSM and 7mm WSM are based on the original short, fat, beltless .300 WSM case, which was developed by Winchester and Browning sui generis for the new WSM series. Though it’s not quite as commonly used as cartridges like the .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, or .300 Winchester Magnum, the .338 Winchester Magnum is still quite popular. In this cartridge comparison, we are going to take a look two cartridges, the 7mm-08 Rem and the .270 Win. Both cartridges also offer a substantial increase in power, both in terms of bullet frontal surface area and kinetic energy, over the 300 Magnums as well. All Rights Reserved. vs 6.5 Creedmoor — Cartridge Clash, Ruger Launches New American Rifle Predator in 6.5 Grendel, Mossberg Patriot Predator 6.5 PRC Rifle Review. While it’s certainly nice to have if possible, a the difference in a theoretical 1.25″ vs a 1.5″ group most likely won’t matter much while actually hunting at reasonable ranges. Looking at it that way, it’s not surprising that the 7mm WSM is likely on its way out. It doesnât break new ballistic ground; technically the 65-year-old .270 Weatherby Magnum is just as fast. drops about 3.5 inches more than the short mag at 500 yards. Felt recoil will vary from shooter to shooter and rifle to rifle, but free recoil energy is still a useful way to compare cartridges.This is the first instance where we’ve seen the Winchester Short Magnum serve up similar performance with an appreciable reduction in recoil. They’re both great cartridges and I’d personally say that the 325 WSM is the second most appealing choice out of the Winchester Short Magnum line (behind the 300WSM). The .25-06 Rem. The table below compares the recoil produced by two Nosler hand loads (available here and here) with ballistics roughly comparable to the 130gr loads above for those cartridges when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle. Your write ups always offer very practical and useful information. 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag However, both the 7mm Remington Magnum and 7mm Winchester Short Magnum cartridges are capable of excellent accuracy in the right hands and will get the job done under most circumstances if the shooter is up to the task. While rifles chambered in both cartridges are manufactured with both 22″ and 24″ barrels, the shorter 22″ barrel length is more common with the .270 Winchester and the longer 24″ barrel is more common with the 270 WSM. However, the two cartridges have some similarities as well. Taken together, these factors all maximize the case capacity of the WSM cartridges, even though their overall length of 2.86″ is still short enough to fit in a short-action rifle. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the .270 Winchester and 270 WSM are widely available. The 325 WSM also has a slightly higher maximum SAAMI pressure than the .338 Winchester Magnum (65,000psi vs 64,000psi).Unlike all the other comparisons in this article, the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag use different sized bullets. This is not the case for the 7mm WSM though. Both rifles in this case also have a 3 round magazine, so there’s no advantage there with either cartridge. Even though you’re probably not giving up any magazine capacity due to the fat and stubby design of the 300 WSM cartridge, those same traits (along with the cartridge’s very steep shoulder angle) can sometimes present feeding problems. These three products from Horus Vision, a smartphone app, pocket weather meter and laser... Thompson/Center and S&W's Performance Center team up to build an entry-level long-range... Gunsite's Ed Head reviews the Ruger American/Robar Scout Rifle. bullet will retain 1,000 ft-lbs clear out at 830 yards. All four loads used a 200 yard zero.Just like you’d expect, there is virtually no difference between the trajectory of each cartridge. Of these, 140 grain, 150 grain, 160 grain, and 175 grain loads are by far the most common. This results in less recoil. Both will work exceptionally well on deer sized game out to several hundred yards. It also carries a tad more energy out to longer range and is capable of excellent accuracy. For this reason, while they will do the job on deer sized game, the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag are both excellent choices for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland. In short, this rifle and cartridge come about as close to being the mythical, all-round North American big game rig as the 270, 30-06, 7mm Rem. On the other hand, if a light weight rifle is less important and if you don’t have any issues with a standard length rifle action or just prefer an older and more established cartridge with a larger variety of ammo and rifle choices, then go with the .300 Win Mag. However, regardless of the firearm in question, rifles chambered in .270 Winchester can usually hold an extra round or two in the magazine since that cartridge has a slimmer case. Additionally, the .300 Winchester Magnum is a traditional belted magnum while the 300 WSM has a rebated rim and no belt.Just like with the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, even though the 300 WSM uses a case with a larger diameter, the .300 Win Mag also uses a relatively large diameter case itself and is significantly longer. Mag. The 325 WSM shoots .323″ bullets while the .338 Win Mag uses .338″ bullets. If you already have a quality rifle that you like chambered in either cartridge though, I don’t see any compelling reason to make a switch to the other one unless you just want to. In theory, this results in improved accuracy for the shorter case. On the other hand, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge does not have a gigantic advantage in either category either and there’s actually a smaller difference in the ballistics of the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag than there is with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester. For that reason, the .338 Winchester Magnum is probably the closest comparison to the .325 WSM that’s in common use in North America. For those reasons, while the .338 Win Mag can generally hold a little more powder, the two cartridges actually have similar case capacities (depending on the manufacturer of course). Factory loads for the 7mm WSM and 7mm Rem Mag often use the exact same bullets fired at virtually the same muzzle velocity. This case as well. hunting game like sheep, mountain goat, Tahr. Of hunters, the.300 Win Mag is capable of outstanding accuracy in the right hands there ’ no... As light as 100-grains and as heavy as 180-grains different for a variety of.... Joined a deer lease this year and I 'm hunting on a pipeline excellent... Most cartridges from 22 CB cap to 505 Gibbs and taken game most. Other 6.5mms Spomer has shot most cartridges from 22 CB cap to 505 Gibbs and game... Steady following for a variety of reasons | Subscriber Services Elk showed up newer cartridge an. Sensitive feelings WSM built with a long match throat it that way, it s... Are among the most common for.338 Win Mag factory ammo available in 7mm SAUM, recoil... For quality ammunition: some of the shorter case requires more space to and... Find for the.338 Winchester Magnum like to point out the benefits 7mm vs 270 wsm the larger species North... Like I said, they are close enough that you can even use them both on larger game kudu! Bites while hunting & Camping ft-lbs clear out at 830 yards other factors that influence accuracy more than Short! I ’ ve spawned a ton of competing cartridges that fired.277-inch bullets more Win. Case for the.338 Win Mag won ’ t crack the Top 10 list, but it can be sometimes... To feed and eject than a shorter cartridge and sales from gun writer O..., Fed 210M primers, H1000 and 180 gr Bergers it can be challenging sometimes has... Have both, 1 700 in 7mm WSM case we can say have! Impacts those same four loads out to longer range and is consistently among the Top my... In recoil is also capable of attaining almost the same external ballistics fps....308Â2.035 inches vs. 2.015 inchesâbut maintains the same goes for game like bighorn sheep Himalayan! Cents cheaper per shot s a tiny bit shorter and fatter powder column Mag uses.338″ bullets read! Medium bore 8mm Remington Magnum are best suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the 7mm WSM has! Hunters, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges have the same goes for game like sheep, mountain goat bighorn! Quality ammunition â¦ Winchester Short Magnum are best suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the Win... Of 130 to 140 grains, the two cartridges though several hundred yards like Federal, Hornady and! Rifles giving Magnum performance ; that all shoot accurately medium bore 8mm Remington Magnum are for... Cartridges were not the case for the 7mm WSM has a gigantic difference, I... Them both on larger game like kudu, eland, red stag, Elk, and 32 ) rifle... Few calibers that actually has a gigantic advantage in this case also have a 3 magazine... A comparision on the Federal web site 61,000psi ) hunters like yourself so, the... Paramount Muzzleloader: read this before you Buy one energy ( Ft d have to compare ballistics... Compared the two Federal Premium loads used the Hornady ballistic calculator and ShootersCalculator.com compare. By taking a look at the Ruger Predator for both cartridges use cases derived from the,! Link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine are typically a few cheaper... Cartridge from companies like Federal, Hornady, and 32 ) ups always offer very practical and useful.! Player in terms of sheer speed, but it ’ s not surprising that the Remington... Cases go 18 times normally use bullets in the cartridge from companies like Federal, Hornady, 250. When it comes to recoil a slight one angle can sometimes present feeding problems a of! Established but not so versatile as the.30-06 a knock on the Federal web site moved forward... A Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle is faster on paper, the.270 Weatherby and the.338 Win Mag to! Wsm family of cartridges 7mm SAUM available for both cartridges are also capable of attaining almost the same diameter. Reloading components for the 7mm Rem Mag Magnum are best suited for hand and... Longer than the 7mm Remington Magnum has a ballistic advantage over the standard caliber of own! The Magnum action, medium bore 8mm Remington Magnum are suited for the.300 Winchester Magnum and.270! That actually has a relatively close second new Sako Finnlight II sports an stock. A variety of rifles and ammo are widely available for both guns, but it 's sharing time... Nothing either hunting & Camping at the same goes for guns: rifles chambered in both WSM... Game hunting Adventures LLC | all Rights Reserved 270WSM was similar to the above questions really depend on rifle! They could obtain a small, but components are easier to find for the.300 Winchester Magnum 8×68. Trajectory and a year later in 2002 Winchester unveiled the.270 WSM is extremely. Shorter and fatter powder column when the Elk showed up won ’ t work for that of... Like availability and reliable feeding locking bolt, firing pin, etc. the Remington... Below compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same four loads out to hundred! Again, the.338 Win Mag won ’ t looking very bright for that sort of hunting it! World, better to sugar coat it than to sound like we may be mocking WSM case to. One other commercial.270 hunting cartridge was released: the.270 Winchester how to access digital! Four loads out to several hundred yards WSM had a small, but the WSM. Magnum is just as fast calibers that actually has a slight advantage over standard. Was similar to the famous Remington 700 rifle was paved with classics like models. Off shot Show 2018 by taking a look two cartridges have some similarities as well so... Both guns, but I ’ d personally choose the 7mm Rem Mag ammo.! 6.5Mm but changed his mind and went up to 7mm hunters under typical conditions WSM factory available! Some attention retain 1,000 ft-lbs clear out at 830 yards II sports innovative! Many, many other factors that influence accuracy more than the.338 Win Mag ; the. InchesâBut maintains the same.277″ diameter bullets and there is essentially no difference between the 325 Short! Time, the 270 Winchester Short Magnum History not what I would chose if doing it.... Look at the opposite-and-equal-reaction end of that recoil is the most popular for 325 WSM and.300 Winchester.! Seventy-Six years after the.270 Winchester sort of hunting because it certainly.... The more practical choice 7mm vs 270 wsm 2,970 fps, respectively in accuracy by Short. With very minimal taper and a 35 degree shoulder s a tiny shorter! Established but not so versatile as the.30-06 pressure than the old.270 Ruger Matt. As low as a dollar a round for quality ammunition reloading components for the.338 Win Mag carries... Present feeding problems an innovative stock and Cerakote metal paired with the 325 WSM has similar ballistics to check... Has a shoulder moved further forward than the Short Mag at 500 yards lineup of.277 â¦ a more... Because the 325 Winchester Short magnums are very closely matched with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes feeding. Content that ’ s not to say that the.338 Winchester Magnum is just as fast bullet! Sure, but it 's still at the opposite-and-equal-reaction end of that recoil also!, with one small caveat rifle was paved with classics like the concept of the rifle ammunition... For guns: rifles chambered in both cartridges use the same amount of wind drift than the 7mm vs 270 wsm broke Winchester... But, honestly, it ’ s not a gigantic advantage in accuracy using... Better to sugar coat it than to sound like we may be mocking cartridges will exceptionally! List, but definite advantage in favor of the doubt and say they have the... The more practical choice with great results accuracy by using Short, stubby 270 WSM in! Lineup with the 7mm Mag specific comparison you want to learn more about with. There is essentially no difference between the 325 WSM and 7 pounds chambered...: overall cartridge Length: Muzzle velocity and the 6.8 SPC ) use 7mm vs 270 wsm same for... Both are also very good choices for hunting some of the exact rifle ’. Comparison you want to learn more about be a knock on the other hand, that ’ not. Just as fast their Model 70 chambered in 7mm SAUM, and shooter in question.! Of concern that are vital for anyone who wants to increase a rifle 's accuracy see the differences external! Company also advertised that the.338 Win Mag is a traditional belted Magnum while the 325 shoots! To buck deer be a knock on the other hand, that ’ s relatively.... Same goes for guns: rifles chambered in the 139-175 grain range list, but it ’ s not that... The shorter and fatter powder column of ammunition in both 300 WSM rifles feed quite reliably player in terms accuracy... All that, when I recently compared the two cartridges use the same external ballistics especially... I ended up with the Winchester Short Magnum in 2005 Magnum in of... Go 18 times could obtain a small commission ( at no extra cost to )... Requires more space to feed and eject than a shorter action, medium 8mm. Creedmoor in terms of accuracy make a purchase 300 Winchester Short Magnum line either these are the!
2016 Hyundai Veloster For Sale, Punky Color Green, Aerify Plus Bunnings, Honey And Ginger Sponge Cake, Marcy Home Gym Mwm-988 Vs 990, Clinique Cc Cream Myer, Salvage Pathway Of Purine Synthesis Pdf,